How does the concept of basic structure doctrine, as established in the Kesavananda Bharati case, relate to amendments made under Article 368?
VE Asked by Veena Shastri from India
Quick Answer
The concept of the basic structure doctrine, established in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), asserts that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution under Article 368, it cannot alter or destroy the fundamental framework or structure of the Constitution itself. Key points regarding the basic structure doctrine and its relation to Article 368 include:Kesavananda Bharati C
Detailed Legal Analysis
The concept of the basic structure doctrine, established in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), asserts that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution under Article 368, it cannot alter or destroy the fundamental framework or structure of the Constitution itself.
Key points regarding the basic structure doctrine and its relation to Article 368 include:
- Kesavananda Bharati Case: The Supreme Court, in a 7-6 majority decision, ruled that Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not absolute and is subject to the basic structure doctrine. This case marked a significant turning point in Indian constitutional law.
- Article 368: This article provides the procedure for amending the Constitution. It states that Parliament may amend the Constitution by passing a bill with a simple majority in the case of ordinary amendments or a special majority for more significant changes.
- Basic Structure Elements: The Supreme Court identified various elements that constitute the basic structure, including:
- Supremacy of the Constitution
- Rule of Law
- Separation of Powers
- Judicial Review
- Federalism
- Fundamental Rights
- Parliamentary Democracy
- Limitations on Amendments: Any amendment that seeks to alter the basic structure is invalid, even if it is passed following the procedures outlined in Article 368. This ensures that essential principles of governance and citizen rights are protected from transient majorities.
- Subsequent Cases: The basic structure doctrine has been upheld in various subsequent decisions, including Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) and I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007), reinforcing the principle that the Constitution's core features cannot be amended.
In conclusion, the basic structure doctrine serves as a safeguard against the arbitrary exercise of parliamentary power, ensuring that the foundational principles of the Constitution remain intact and protected from potential overreach by legislative amendments under Article 368.
Disclaimer: AI-generated for educational purposes only. Does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified practitioner.