240,679+ questions
↑↓ navigate ↵ select esc close
Home / Constitutional Law / Question
Constitutional Law India · Just now · 297 views

The Faridabad district magistrate imposed Section 144 across the entire city for a month. Is this constitutional?

VI Asked by Vikram Patel from India

Quick Answer

Section 163 BNSS, 2023 (formerly Section 144 CrPC) allows restrictions to prevent imminent danger, but a blanket city-wide imposition for a month is excessive and likely violates Article 19(1)(b) and 19(1)(a).

Detailed Legal Analysis

Section 163 BNSS, 2023 (formerly Section 144 CrPC) allows restrictions to prevent imminent danger, but a blanket city-wide imposition for a month is excessive and likely violates Article 19(1)(b) and 19(1)(a). The Supreme Court in Anuradha Bhasin (2020) held that restrictions on assembly and internet must be proportionate, time-bound, and subject to judicial review.

File a representation for lifting or narrowing the order before the Faridabad magistrate. Challenge the order before Allahabad High Court under Article 226 for a writ of certiorari quashing it as arbitrary under Article 14.

Preserve the order and its Gazette notification as evidence. Refer to Uttar Pradesh Rent Control Act 1972 for any state police or magisterial procedural rules in Uttar Pradesh.

Last updated: October 3, 2026 LPReviewed by LawPucho Legal Team

Disclaimer: AI-generated for educational purposes only. Does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified practitioner.

Share: