The respondents I made iny succession case as a petitioner, I actually made them proforma respondents. But I have not mentioned this in my SUCCESSION case plaint. I have only prayed for a relief of my half share in the succession case. These proforma respondents are now giving a false statement after I closed my evidence that it is my "DAVA"as a Petitioner that the respondents also be given half the share in the succession case. The succession case is now at arguments stage. What should I say in my arguments?

In the arguments stage of the succession case, you should clarify the issue of the respondents being proforma respondents and emphasize that you only prayed for a relief of your half share in the succession case. You should assert that there was no prayer on your part for the respondents to be given half the share in the succession case.

You can argue that the respondents' statement about it being your "dava" (plea) for them to be given half the share is false and baseless. It is important to highlight the specific relief sought in your plaint and reiterate that you did not make any such request with respect to the respondents' share in the property.

Additionally, you can point out that the respondents are making this false statement only after the evidence has been closed, which may indicate a lack of credibility or credibility issue on their part. Emphasize that their assertion is a misrepresentation of the facts and should not be considered by the court in its decision-making process.

Overall, your arguments should focus on maintaining the integrity of your original prayer for relief and refuting the respondents' misleading statements regarding your intentions in the succession case.