Skip to content
242,384+ questions answered 100+ cities Ask anonymously
LawPucho Ask. Get clarity. Ask a free question
LawPucho
Home / General Legal Query

General Legal Query Questions

Browse general legal query questions asked by people across India.

150+ questions

Questions in General Legal Query are answered with reference to the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, depending on the nature of the dispute. Each answer states the section that applies, the forum that hears the matter and the limitation period, so the position can be checked against the official text at India Code before you act on it.

The forum depends on the facts rather than the label: a dispute described as a family matter may be heard by a family court, a magistrate or a civil judge depending on whether the relief sought is maintenance, custody, injunction or declaration. Where the law has been renumbered by the 2023 criminal law reforms, answers note both the old and the new section numbers.

Updated live
jaipur · 11 May 2026

मेरी कृषि भूमि खसरा नंबर 508/1, ग्राम आसलपुर, तहसील जोबनेर, जिला जयपुर में स्थित है। इस भूमि में लाली देवी खातेदार हैं। समस्या यह है कि मेरी भूमि तक पहुंचने के लिए कोई स्पष्ट रास्ता उपलब्ध नहीं है और भूमि practically landlocked स्थिति में है। मेरी भूमि के सामने/पास खसरा नंबर 1485/515 एवं संबंधित 515 श्रृंखला की भूमि स्थित है, जो राजस्व रिकॉर्ड में “गै.मु.नदी” (गैर मुमकिन नदी) के रूप में दर्ज है। वर्तमान जमाबंदी में इस भूमि पर कुछ निजी व्यक्तियों के नाम खातेदार के रूप में दर्ज हैं, लेकिन मुझे जानकारी मिली है कि यह भूमि पहले सरकारी/अलॉटमेंट भूमि थी, संभवतः किसी शहीद सैनिक/पूर्व सैनिक परिवार को खेती हेतु आवंटित की गई थी और बाद में ट्रांसफर/विक्रय हुई।

MOMohit Sharma Read Answer
jaipur · 11 May 2026

मेरी कृषि भूमि खसरा नंबर 508/1, ग्राम आसलपुर, तहसील जोबनेर, जिला जयपुर में स्थित है। इस भूमि में लाली देवी खातेदार हैं। समस्या यह है कि मेरी भूमि तक पहुंचने के लिए कोई स्पष्ट रास्ता उपलब्ध नहीं है और भूमि practically landlocked स्थिति में है। मेरी भूमि के सामने/पास खसरा नंबर 1485/515 एवं संबंधित 515 श्रृंखला की भूमि स्थित है, जो राजस्व रिकॉर्ड में “गै.मु.नदी” (गैर मुमकिन नदी) के रूप में दर्ज है। वर्तमान जमाबंदी में इस भूमि पर कुछ निजी व्यक्तियों के नाम खातेदार के रूप में दर्ज हैं, लेकिन मुझे जानकारी मिली है कि यह भूमि पहले सरकारी/अलॉटमेंट भूमि थी, संभवतः किसी शहीद सैनिक/पूर्व सैनिक परिवार को खेती हेतु आवंटित की गई थी और बाद में ट्रांसफर/विक्रय हुई। मेरी मुख्य कानूनी जिज्ञासाएँ निम्न हैं: 1. क्या “गै.मु.नदी” दर्ज भूमि पर वर्तमान में सरकार/राजस्व विभाग का कोई नियंत्रण या सार्वजनिक प्रकृति अभी भी लागू मानी जाती है, भले ही निजी नाम दर्ज हों? 2. यदि यह भूमि पहले सरकारी अलॉटमेंट थी, तो क्या इसकी बिक्री/हस्तांतरण वैध था या उस पर कोई प्रतिबंध लागू थे? 3. चूंकि मेरी भूमि तक कोई उचित रास्ता नहीं है और निकटतम practical access highway की तरफ से इसी भूमि के माध्यम से संभव है, क्या मैं राजस्थान सरकार के नए रास्ता संबंधी प्रावधान, राजस्व विभाग, easement/right of way, या किसी अन्य कानूनी प्रक्रिया के तहत रास्ता प्राप्त कर सकता हूँ? 4. इस स्थिति में मुझे SDM/Tehsildar/Revenue Court/Civil Court में कौन-सी प्रक्रिया अपनानी चाहिए? 5. क्या इस प्रकार की “गै.मु.नदी” भूमि से रास्ता प्राप्त करने के लिए राजस्व विभाग द्वारा आवेदन देकर समाधान संभव है?

MOMohit Sharma Read Answer
jaipur · 11 May 2026

My agricultural land is located at Khasra No. 508/1, Village Asalpur, Tehsil Jobner, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Lali Devi is recorded as one of the khatedars/owners in the revenue records. The main issue is that my land does not have a proper access road and is practically in a landlocked condition. Near/in front of my land, there is land under Khasra No. 1485/515 and related 515 series khasra numbers, which are recorded in the revenue records as “Gair Mumkin Nadi” (non-cultivable river/drain land). Currently, some private individuals’ names are recorded as khatedars in the jamabandi, but I have been informed that this land was originally government/allotted land, possibly granted to a martyr soldier/ex-serviceman family for agricultural purposes and later transferred/sold. My main legal questions are: Even though private names are currently recorded, does the “Gair Mumkin Nadi” classification still mean that the land remains under any government/revenue department control or public nature? If this land was originally government-allotted land, was its later sale/transfer legally valid, or were there any restrictions on transfer? Since my property has no proper access road and the nearest practical access from the highway side is through this land, can I legally obtain a road/access under: Is it possible to obtain legal access/road through this “Gair Mumkin Nadi” land through a revenue department application or government process?

MOMohit Sharma Read Answer
jaipur · 11 May 2026

My agricultural land is located at Khasra No. 508/1, Village Asalpur, Tehsil Jobner, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Lali Devi is recorded as one of the khatedars/owners in the revenue records. The main issue is that my land does not have a proper access road and is practically in a landlocked condition. Near/in front of my land, there is land under Khasra No. 1485/515 and related 515 series khasra numbers, which are recorded in the revenue records as “Gair Mumkin Nadi” (non-cultivable river/drain land). Currently, some private individuals’ names are recorded as khatedars in the jamabandi, but I have been informed that this land was originally government/allotted land, possibly granted to a martyr soldier/ex-serviceman family for agricultural purposes and later transferred/sold. My main legal questions are: Even though private names are currently recorded, does the “Gair Mumkin Nadi” classification still mean that the land remains under any government/revenue department control or public nature? If this land was originally government-allotted land, was its later sale/transfer legally valid, or were there any restrictions on transfer? Since my property has no proper access road and the nearest practical access from the highway side is through this land, can I legally obtain a road/access under: the new Rajasthan government road/access provisions for landlocked properties, easement/right of way laws, revenue department process, or any other legal mechanism? In this situation, what would be the correct legal procedure: application before SDM/Tehsildar, Revenue Court, Civil Court, or any other authority? Is it possible to obtain legal access/road through this “Gair Mumkin Nadi” land through a revenue department application or government process?

MOMohit Sharma Read Answer
faridabad · 03 Apr 2026

To, The Director, Department of Town and Country Planning, Haryana Cc: Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM), Ballabgarh Subject: Pre-notification legal objection under Article 300A and applicable land acquisition laws – Request for exclusion of ancestral agricultural land from proposed industrial sector, Village Harphala, District Faridabad Respected Sir/Madam, I, Rahul Vashist, on behalf of my family, being the lawful recorded co-owners of agricultural land situated in Village Harphala, Tehsil Ballabgarh, District Faridabad (full particulars including Khasra numbers shall be furnished as required), respectfully submit this preliminary legal objection and representation for your kind consideration. At the outset, it is submitted that although our land appears to be included within a proposed industrial sector under the prevailing development plan, no notification under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 or any other applicable acquisition law has been issued till date with respect to our land. Accordingly, this representation is being submitted at the pre-notification stage, to place on record our objections and to safeguard our legal and constitutional rights. GROUNDS OF OBJECTION 1. Protection under Article 300A – Right to Property It is respectfully submitted that the subject land is a constitutionally protected property under Article 300A of the Constitution of India, which mandates that no person shall be deprived of property save by authority of law. Any arbitrary inclusion of our land in a development plan, without due process and necessity, would be contrary to the spirit of constitutional protection afforded to property holders. 2. Mandatory Safeguards under RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, the following safeguards are mandatory prior to acquisition: Social Impact Assessment (SIA) Determination of public purpose Consideration of objections of affected families Minimization of displacement At present, no such due process has been undertaken with respect to our land, making its inclusion premature and legally questionable. 3. Violation of Livelihood Rights (Article 21 – Judicial Interpretation) The Hon’ble Supreme Court has consistently held that the right to livelihood is an integral part of Article 21. Our land constitutes the primary source of livelihood for our family, and any proposed acquisition or forced conversion would lead to severe economic displacement, thereby infringing upon our fundamental rights. 4. Existing Productive Use & Non-Speculative Nature of Land The land is actively used for agricultural and allied purposes, and we are in the process of undertaking structured agro-based storage and MSME-related activities thereon. Therefore, the land: Is not vacant or idle Is not held for speculative purposes Is already contributing to local economic activity Such land deserves higher protection under acquisition jurisprudence. 5. Doctrine of Least Displacement & Availability of Alternatives It is a settled legal principle that acquisition should: Minimize displacement and avoid affecting actively used livelihood land where alternatives exist It is respectfully submitted that: Other non-productive or less fertile land parcels are available in the vicinity Inclusion of our productive land, without examining alternatives, is arbitrary and inequitable 6. Premature Inclusion without Immediate Public Necessity No on-ground development, infrastructure execution, or acquisition proceedings have commenced in the area. In absence of immediate public necessity, inclusion of our land in a proposed sector: Creates uncertainty Restricts lawful use of land Causes economic prejudice without compensation 7. Fragmentation Leading to Economic Non-Viability Any partial acquisition or sector-based fragmentation will render the remaining land: Economically unviable Functionally unusable This would result in disproportionate hardship, which is required to be avoided under acquisition principles. 8. Principles of Natural Justice It is respectfully submitted that any action affecting property rights must comply with: Right to be heard Fair consideration of objections Non-arbitrary decision-making We request that our representation be duly considered before any further steps are undertaken. PRAYER In light of the above, we respectfully request your good office to: Reconsider the inclusion of our land within the proposed industrial sector; Exclude our land from any proposed acquisition or compulsory development process; Take this representation on official record as a pre-notification objection for all future proceedings; Provide an opportunity of personal hearing before any adverse decision is taken. We are willing to provide all necessary documents and appear before the competent authority as required. Kindly acknowledge receipt of this representation. Thanking you, Yours sincerely, Rahul Vashist (On behalf of co-owners) Village Harphala, District Faridabad Mobile: [Your Number] this is my email to protect our land from acquiring under industrial acquirement

RARahul Read Answer
jawad · 18 Mar 2026

Civil dispute

SUSulakshna Bohra Mishra Read Answer
Mumbai · 02 Mar 2026

I want to ask questions about SRA project

SWswapnil kshirsagar Read Answer
Dankuni, west bengal · 18 Feb 2026

Bank account frozen since last five years

SASANAT KUMAR TA Read Answer
Patna · 09 Feb 2026

I have kill a man

ADAditya Gaurav Read Answer
Palanpur · 19 Jan 2026

મારો એક કેશ છે તેની વિગત હુ તમને જણાવું છું મેં બેન્કમાં 2006મા ટુ વહીલર ની લોન લીધી 2009 સુધી હપ્તા ભર્યા, પછી પરિસ્થિતિ ના હોવાના કારણે હપ્તા ભરવાની બંધ થયું હવે બેંકે સુ કર્યું તે તમને જણાવું બેંકે 2020 મા npa નોટિસ મોકલી અને 2022 મા મારી જાણ વગર હપ્તા ચાલુ કરીને બોઉન્સ કરાયા અને 2024મા સિબિલ મા રિપોર્ટ કરી દીધો અને 2025મા જયારે મેં લોન લીધી હતી 2006મા ત્યારે મારા જોડે એક સેવિંગ એકાઉન્ટ ખોલાયું હતું એમાં 1000/-₹ભરાયા હતા એ 1000/-₹2025મા મારા લોન ખાતામાં ટ્રાન્સફર કર્યા અને એન્ટ્રી બતાવી મારી જાણ વગર હવે મેં સિબિલમાં ફરિયાદ કરી શિબિલે bank તરફી ચુકાદો આપ્યો પછી rbi મા મેં ફરિયાદ કરી તો rbi એબેંક તરફી કશુ જોયા વગર જેમકે npa તારીખ ફરીહપ્તા ચાલુ કર્યા તે વગેરે જે મેં ઉપર જણાવેલ મુદ્દા તમને કીધા એ rbi સમક્ષ રાખ્યા પણ તેમને bank ના એક તરફી પુરાવા જોઈને રિજેક્ટ કાર્યો કેશ હવે તમે કેહ જોવો અને આછી સલાહ આપો કે મારે ઔ કરાય કાયદાથી

MAManoj Laxmansinh Dodiya Read Answer
Ali · 19 Jan 2026

Sajjat Ali and the rest

SASajjat Read Answer
Ali · 19 Jan 2026

Sajjat Ali

SASajjat Read Answer

Not finding your exact situation?

Talk to an advocate about your own general legal query matter — one full hour, instant booking, your documents reviewed on the call, a written summary afterwards.

Book now — ₹2,000

1 hour, phone or video

Frequently Asked Questions about General Legal Query

How to get free legal aid in India?

Free legal aid is available under the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987. Eligible: women, children, SC/ST, disabled, victims of trafficking, and persons earning less than ₹3 lakh annually. Apply at the District Legal Services Authority or State Legal Services Authority.

What is the difference between civil and criminal cases?

Civil cases involve disputes between private parties seeking compensation or remedies. Criminal cases involve offenses against society punishable by imprisonment or fine. Civil cases are filed by individuals; criminal cases are prosecuted by the State.

How to verify a lawyer credentials in India?

Verify a lawyer credentials on the Bar Council of India website (bcindia.org) or your state Bar Council. Check their enrollment number, year of enrollment, and whether they are an advocate or senior advocate.

What is the fee for filing a court case in India?

Court fees vary by case type and state. Civil suits: ad valorem fees based on claim value (0.5%-4%). Criminal complaints: nominal fees. Consumer complaints: ₹100-₹5,000 based on claim amount. Some categories like family court matters have reduced fees.

How long does a court case take in India?

Court case duration varies: consumer cases 6 months-2 years, family court matters 1-3 years, civil suits 3-10 years, criminal cases 2-7 years. Supreme Court appeals take 2-5 years. Alternative Dispute Resolution (mediation, arbitration) is faster.